SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Gau) 9

A.K.PATNAIK
Kosheswar Bharali – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D. C. Kathhazarika B. Choudhury, Sr. G. A. Assam

Judgement

This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner for Mandamus on the respondents not to settle the Salmore-Nimatighat Parght through tender for the year 1999-2000 and for quashing the order of the Government communicated by WT Message dated 25-6-99 rejecting the application of the petitioner for extension of the settlement made in his favour in respect of the said Parghat.

2. The facts briefly are that the petitioner is the sitting lessee of Salmora-Nimatighat Parghat since 1995. For the year 1997-98, the said Salmore-Nimatighat Parghat was settled with the petitioner and the petitioner operated motorised passenger boat service as per the said settlement but suffered heavy losses. He, therefore, appealed to the State Government for settling the said Parghat in his favour for the year 1998-99 and the Government settled the said parghat with the petitioner at 10% enhanced rate upon the last years settled value. The said period of settlement ended on 30-6-99. The petitioners case is that he also suffered loss on account of unprecedented flood in the year 1998 and, therefore, he filed an appeal dated 24-5-99 before the Sub-Divisiona







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top