SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Gau) 26

J.N.SARMA
Mandira Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
U.Bhuyan, N.Dutta, D.Goswami

All the civil rules raise almost same question of law and facts and as such they are taken up for hearing together.

2. I have heard Sri N. Dutta, learned Advocate for the petitioners assisted by Sri U. Bhuyan, learned Advocate and Mr. D. Goswami, learned Govt Advocate for the respondents.

3. All these applications have been filed by the teachers of LP Schools for

certain benefits which will be highlighted later on. It will be necessary to give the facts of each-case.

4. Civil Rule No. 2440 of 1997-This writ application has been filed by 11 persons and 12th petitioner is a Sikshak Sangstha in the name and style of Sibsagar Jilla Brittidhari Sikshak Sangstha. The case in brief is that all of them were duly selected to be appointed as teachers in LP schools and they were appointed as stipendiary teachers. It is stated in the writ application that these petitioners were called for interview and they went through the selection process and on being successful all of them Were issued appointment letters by the authority. However, they were appointed as stipendiary teachers in various LP Schools in the district of Sibsagar, some at a monthly stipend of Rs. 750 per month and a few others as lo


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top