P.C.PHUKAN
Dinesh Chandra Ray – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
2. By this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of the order dated 28.4.90 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Kokrajhar dismissing him from service and also the order dated 24.7.91 passed by the Commissioner, Lower Assam Division vide Memo No. PAP.4/90/57 and also the order dated 28.10.91 passed by the Assam Administrative Tribunal rejecting the petitioner's appeal petition.
3. Petitioner's case in brief is that he was appointed as a Process Server in the Gosaigaon Tehsil Office in the Kokrajhar District wef 27.7.67. He was placed under suspension by the SDO (C), Kokrajhar by order dated 14.7.82 with immediate effect. He was also served with a show cause notice dated 20.3.84 by the Deputy Commissioner, Kokrajhar. Charges were framed against him issuing the statements of allegations and he was called upon to submit his written statement of defence within 10 days from the date of receipt of the show cause notice. The a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.