BRIJESH KUMAR, D.N.CHOWDHURY
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Sadananda Sen – Respondent
out of a judgment and order dated 16.6.98, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), Guwahati Bench in Original Application No.69 of 1991 (hereinafter referred to as the OA), whereby the order of compulsory retirement that was passed against the applicant/respondent, Sadananda Sen, on 7.12.88 issued by the Deputy Chief Accounts Officer (Traffic) was set aside. The facts leading to issuance of the aforesaid order are as follows.
The respondent/applicant, at the relevant time was working as Accounts Assistant in the North East Frontier Railway and posted at New Jalpaiguri. By order under No.AD/COM/Review/Service/policy dated 7.12.88, the respondent/applicant was compulsorily retired from service. The respondent submitted two representations, one on 22.6.89 addressed to the Financial Adviser and Chief Accounts Officer, NF Railway, Maligaon and the other one on 16.2.90 addressed to the General Manager, NF Railway, Maligaon. Failing to get appropriate remedy, the respondent applicant presented an application under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1988 in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.