M.L.SINGHAL
Namita Paul – Appellant
Versus
Food Corporation of India and others – Respondent
Heard Mr. A. K. Bhowmik, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. S. Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. K. Biswas, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner in response to the advertisement issued by the respondents submitted tender for transportation of foodgrains/sugar/allied materials from Railway head, Kumarghat to the godown of Agartala, the last date fixed for receipt of the tender was 13-9-1996. The petitioner along with the tender deposited earnest money of Rs. 1,60,000/-, on opening of the tenders, the tender of the petitioner was found fourth lowest. Earlier, the respondents on most occasions used to appoint more than one contractors for one transportation work against the single tender considering the volume of work and usually call all the valid tenderers to come for negotiations and reduce rates to that of the lowest tenderer or such other rates as may be reasonable and after negotiation, used to engage more than one contractors at negotiated rates after dividing the work between the contractors. In view of the usual practice of the respondents, the petitioner by letter dated 16-10-1996 intimated her willingness to the responde
Shrilekha Vidyarthi v. State of U.P.
Mahabir Auto Stores v. Indian Oil Corporation, AIR 1990 SC 1031 : 1990 (3) SCC 752
Dwarkadas Marfatia and Sons v. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Ajay Haria v. Khalid Mujib Sehravardi
Div. Forest Officer v. Biswanath Tea Co. Ltd., AIR 1981 SC 1368 : 1981 (3) SCC 238
Ramana v. I. A. Authority of India
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Radhakrishan Agarwal v. State of Bihar, AIR 1977 SC 1496 : 1977 (3) SCC 457 , 5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.