SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Gau) 229

M.L.SINGHAL
Namita Paul – Appellant
Versus
Food Corporation of India and others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A. K. Bhowmik, Sr. Advocate, S. Ghosh, S. R. Dey, S. Roy, D. K. Biswas

Judgement

Heard Mr. A. K. Bhowmik, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. S. Ghosh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. K. Biswas, learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner in response to the advertisement issued by the respondents submitted tender for transportation of foodgrains/sugar/allied materials from Railway head, Kumarghat to the godown of Agartala, the last date fixed for receipt of the tender was 13-9-1996. The petitioner along with the tender deposited earnest money of Rs. 1,60,000/-, on opening of the tenders, the tender of the petitioner was found fourth lowest. Earlier, the respondents on most occasions used to appoint more than one contractors for one transportation work against the single tender considering the volume of work and usually call all the valid tenderers to come for negotiations and reduce rates to that of the lowest tenderer or such other rates as may be reasonable and after negotiation, used to engage more than one contractors at negotiated rates after dividing the work between the contractors. In view of the usual practice of the respondents, the petitioner by letter dated 16-10-1996 intimated her willingness to the responde























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top