SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Gau) 118

H.K.SEMA, P.G.AGARWAL
Siddharta Kalita – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.Choudhary, S.Sharma, N.Saikia, K.N.Choudhary, J.Roy, D.K.Das , A.Bora, D.K.Mishra

H. K. Sema, C. J. (Acting) —

Heard Mr. KN Choudhury, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. DK Mishra, learned counsel for the private respondents and Mr. C. Choudhury, learned Senior Govt Advocate, Assam.

2. This writ appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 12. 4.2001 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition (C) No.2115 of 2001.

3. The dispute relates to repairing and improvement of Kamalpur Morrowa Road under the Chief Engineer, PWD. The undisputed fact is that a tender notice was issued on 15.2.2001 and the same was published in the 'News Front', a daily in its issue dated 4.3.2001. The preliminary work order was issued in favour of the respondents on 19.3.2001 and the formal work orders were issued on 26.3.2001. A grievance has been raised by the writ appellants that the said tender has not been issued in accordance with Rule 254 of the Assam Financial Rules, 1954. The admitted position is that pursuant to the short tender notice there were only 7 tenders and the work in question has been distributed to 5 tenderers.

4. At this stage we would like to point out that the fact that only 7 tenders have been received pursuant to the notice inviting










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top