SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Gau) 138

H.K.SEMA, RANJAN GOGOI
Biddyut Jyoti Purkayastha – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Talukdar, M.U.Mahmud, B.K.Sharma, M.Agarwal, A.Kasim, D.K.Das

H. K. Sema, C. J. (Acting)-

I have heard Mr. BK Sharma, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. DK Das, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 and Mr. Goswami, learned Govt Advocate, Assam appearing for respondent Nos 1 to 3.

2. The appellant is aggrieved by an order dated 18.5.2001 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP (C) No. 3471 of 2001.

3. The apple of discord involved in this series of litigation was with regard to holding of the charge of the office of the Deputy Inspector of Schools, Silchar. The fight is between the appellant and the respondent No.4. resulting into filing of series of civil rules, thereby multiplying the litigation and creating problems instead of resolving the dispute.

4. In civil rule WP (C) No. 1222 of 2001, an interim order was passed on 26.2.2001. The Writ Appeal No. 71 of 2001 challenging the order dated 26.2.2001, has been disposed of by the Division Bench on 5.3.2001. Thereafter, respondent No.4 filed WP (C) No. 2643 of 2001, and the appellant was also arrayed as a party respondent. This Court in Misc Case No. 579/2001 passed an order of status quo with regard to the post of Deputy Inspector of Schools, Silchar, on 25.4.2001.

5. It i


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top