SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Gau) 166

RANJAN GOGOI
Karna Kumar Barman – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Choudhary, D.Choudhary

Heard Mr. D. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. NC Phukan, learned counsel for State-respondents.

2. The case of the petitioner in this writ petition is that three items of work as stated in para 3 of the writ petition has been allotted to him in the year, 1999, by the Executive Engineer, (PWD (Roads) NK Division, Nalbari. The petitioner a contends that the aforesaid three works were duly executed by him within the time prescribed and that on the basis of the measurement of the work undertaken by the authorities, final bills were prepared and submitted by the petitioner for payment of the dues on account of the aforesaid works. According to the petitioner, total amount due to him is Rs. 3,42,087.00 out of the which the respondents have paid Rs. 56,000.00 leaving a balance amount of Rs. 2,86,037.00. The further case of the petitioner is that though the aforesaid amount was due to him for long time and in spite several representations submitted to the authorities for early payment of the aforesaid amount, payment have not been made compelling the petitioner to approach this Court by way of this writ petition. The writ petitioner has annexed to the writ petition a co




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top