SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Gau) 179

H.K.KUMAR SINGH, B.B.DEB
Dilip Kumar Modak – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
U.B.Saha, A.M.Lodh, T.D.Majumdar, A.Lodh, M.Dutta

H. K. Kumar Singh, J.-

Heard Mr. AM Lodh, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and also heard Mr. UB Saha, the learned Senior Govt Advocate assisted by Mr. TD Majumder, the learned Additional Govt Advocate for the respondents.

2. This appeal has been filed under section 96 of the CPC against the order dated 19.1.2001 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division No. 2, West Tripura, Agartala in suit, Money Suit No. 110 of 1999.

3. Upon hearing the learned counsel of both sides it is found that the plaintiff/appellant herein filed a suit which was registered as MS 110 of 1999 in the Court of learned Civil Judge, Senior Division No.2, West Tripura, Agartala. The suit was for a claim of a sum of Rs.2,41,396. Along with this suit the plaintiff also filed a separate application seeking leave of the Court to file the suit as an indigent person under the provision of Order 33 of CPC. This application was registered as Misc (P) No. 123 of 1999. It appears that the said application was taken up for hearing under the provision of Order 33 and ultimately by an order dated 19.1.2001 the application seeking leave of the Court to sue as an indigent person was rejecte
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top