SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Gau) 223

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
A.K.Patnaik, J.
Dayal Das -Appellant
Versus
State of Assam and Ors. -Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 5216 of 2001
Decided On : 16-08-2001

Advocates Appeared:
A.K.Bhattacharjee, P.C.Deka, P.C.Barpujari, N.Deka, M.Sharma, K.K.Bhattacharyya , A.K.Choudhary, D.K.Singh, S.K.Medhi

The transfer of government officials should be made with proper justification and grounds as required by the office memorandum. Approval of the Chief Minister is necessary for a transfer if it is made before completion of 3 years of service at one place.

Headnote:

Transfer - Government Officials - ABP.40/91/117, Office Memorandum dated 19.8.1992 - The court found that the transfer of the petitioner was made without proper justification and grounds as required by the office memorandum. The court directed that the transfer should not be given effect until proper justification with grounds are recorded in writing and placed before the Chief Minister for approval.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a Divisional Officer, challenged his transfer from Kohora Soil Conservation Division, Kohora to the Eastern Assam Soil Conservation Division, Dibrugarh. The petitioner argued that the transfer violated the guidelines for transfer of officials as laid down in the office memorandum dated 19th Sept 92.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the transfer of the petitioner was made without proper justification and grounds as required by the office memorandum. The court directed that the transfer should not be given effect until proper justification with grounds are recorded in writing and placed before the Chief Minister for approval.

Issues: Violation of guidelines for transfer of officials as laid down in the office memorandum dated 19th Sept 92.

Ratio Decidendi: The transfer of government officials should be made with proper justification and grounds as required by the office memorandum. Approval of the Chief Minister is necessary for a transfer if it is made before completion of 3 years of service at one place.

Final Decision: The court directed that the transfer should not be given effect until proper justification with grounds are recorded in writing and placed before the Chief Minister for approval.

A.K. PATNAIK, J-

The petitioner is working as Divisional Officer under the Soil Conservation Department under the Govt. of Assam. By an order dated 28.3.2000, the services of the petitioner were placed at the disposal of Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council, Diphu for posting him as Divisional Officer, Hamren Soil Conservation Division. The Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council accepted the posting of the petitioner as Divisional Officer, Hamren Soil Conservation Division by order dated 5.4.2000. He was thereafter transferred by the authority of the 'Karbi Anglong Autonomous Autonomous Council to Kohora Soil Conservation Division, Dolmara by order dated 19.9.2000. By a notification dated 27.7.2001, the Govt. of Assam Soil Conservation Department made a chain of transfers in the Soil Conservation Department and in the said chain of transfers the petitioner has been transferred from the post of Divisional Officer, Kohora Soil Conservation Department, Kohora and posted as Divisional Officer, Eastern Assam Soil Conservation Division, Dibrugarh. By the said notification Sri P. Barkakati (respondent No. 5) who was posted as Divisional Officer, South Bank Soil Conservation Division, Guwahati has been transferred and posted as Divisional Officer, Kohora Soil Conservation Division, Kohora. By the said notification, Sri J.C. Gogoi (respondent No. 4) has been transferred from the post of Divisional Officer, Eastern Assam Soil Conservation Division,1 Dibrugarh and posted as Divisional Officer, Soil Conservation Research Division, Guwahati. In this writ petition the petitioner has challenged his transfer from Kohora Soil Conservation Division, Kohora to the Eastern Assam Soil Conservation Division, Dibrugarh by the said notification dated 27.7.2001. On 30.7.2001, this Court issued rule, but did not pass any stay order as prayed by the petitioner and instead observed that the prayer for stay again may be renewed after production of record.

2. The records have been produced before the Court today and the prayer for stay has been renewed by Mr A.K. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr Bhattacharjee submitted that by the office memorandum dated 19th Sept 92 of the Government of Assam, Department of Personnel, Personnel (B), the Government policies of transfer of officials have been laid down and one of the guidelines indicated in the said office memorandum is that where public interest demands, that an officer should be transferred from his place of posting even before completion of 3 years in a place, proper justification and grounds may be recorded in writing for the transfer and orders issued only after getting approval of the Chief Minister for such a transfer. Mr Bhattacharjee submitted that this particular guideline laid down in the office memorandum dated 9th September 1992 has been violated because the petitioner has not completed 3 years service either under the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council or at Kohora Soil Conservation Division, Kohora. He further submitted that the petitioner still continues to be the Divisional Officer, Kohora Soil Conservation Division and he has not been released from the said charge as yet.

3. Mr P.C. Deka, learned counsel for the respondent No. 5, on the other hand, submitted that pursuant to the impugned notification dated 27.7.2001 the said respondent No. 5 has submitted a joining report as Divisional Officer, Kohora on 30.7.2001 and he has been allowed to join by the Deputy Commissioner, Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council on 13/14th August, 2001. Mr Deka, however, fairly stated that he has no instruction as to whether the respondent No. 5 has been released from the post of Divisional Officer, South Bank Soil Conservation Division, Guwahati from where he is sought to be transferred under the impugned notification dated 27.7.2001.

4. On a perusal of the records produced by Mr B.P. Bora, learned senior Govt. Advocate before this Court, I find that the Minister, Soil Conservation Department has on 20






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top