SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Gau) 34

H.K.KUMAR SINGH
Sandha DebI Thapa – Appellant
Versus
Anjali Debi Thapa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.Dutta, K.Deb, A.M.Lodh, A.Lodh, A.De, A.K.Deb

H.K.K. SINGH, J.—

These two civil misc. applications bearing Nos. 49 of 2001 and 51 of 2001 are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order.

2. The plaintiff-respondent in both the applications filed a suit for declaration of title and mandatory injunction against the respondents-petitioner. Now the stage of the suit is at the second appeal stage. Originally the suit was decreed and in decree came in appeal and in second the appeal suit was remanded. The suit was again decreed after remand. Against the decree both the plaintiffs and the defendants filed appeals and both the appeals were decided in favour of the plaintiffs. Now the defendants have filed two second appeals which have been registered as R.S. A. No. 15/2000 and R.S. A. No. 16/ 2000. In the midst of hearing of the aforesaid two appeals which arose out of the same original decree, the plaintiff-petitioner herein has filed two separate applications praying for the same relief i.e. amendment of the plaint.

3. The proposed amendment is in respect of schedule of the suit land appended to the plaint. The proposed amendment is reproduced below:-

"At the last page of the plaint in Schedule-A after the words Agartala Shee








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top