H.K.KUMAR SINGH
Anjali Debi Thapa – Appellant
Versus
Sandhya Debi Thapa – Respondent
These two civil misc. applications bearingNos 49 of 2001 and 51 of 2001 are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order.
2. The plaintiff-respondent in both the applications filed a suit for declaration of title and mandatory injunction against the respondents-petitioners. Now the stage of the suit is at the second appeal stage. Originally the suit was decreed and the decree came in appeal and in second appeal suit was remanded. The suit was again decreed after remanded. Against the decree both the plaintiffs and the defendants filed appeals and both the appeals were decided in favour of the plaintiffs. Now the defendants have filed two second appeals which have been registered as R.S.A. No. 15/2000 and R.S.A. No. 16/2000. In the midst of hearing of the aforesaid two appeals which arose out of the same original decree, the plaintiff-petitioner herein has filed two separate applications praying for the same relief i.e. amendment of the plaint.
3. The proposed amendment is in respect of schedule of the suit land appended to the plaint. The proposed amendment is reproduced below:-
"At the last page of the plaint in Schedule-A after the words Agartala Sheet No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.