SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Gau) 100

A.K.PATNAIK, B.B.DEB
Bimal Kumar Chanda – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.Chakraborty, U.B.Saha, D.K.Biswas , A.L.Saha, T.D.Majumdar

A.K. PATNAIK, J. —

This is a public interest litigation filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner.

2. The petitioner, Sri Bimal Kumar Chanda, had been working as Principal in-charge of the Tripura Government Law College, Agartala, and after his superannuation from Government service he is working for advancing the social interest. He has stated in the writ petition that in recent years, the peace in the State of Tripura has been disturbed, as many as 19 police station areas have been declared disturbed areas and are under the Armed Forces (Special Power) Act, 1958, 111 persons have been killed, 84 persons have been kidnapped, arid since 1993 till 1997, 92 police personnel and security personnel have been killed by the extremists. But the State Government of Tripura has not established State Human Rights Commission. The petitioner has, therefore, prayed for an appropriate writ or direction to the State of Tripura to establish State Human Rights Commission for the State of Tripura within a specific period.

3. Mr. A.L. Saha, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the preamble of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top