AMITAVA ROY
Phulmati and and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Bidyut Jyoti Dutta Choudhury and Ors. – Respondent
The present revision petitioners are plaintiffs in Title Suit No. 175/98 filed in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 1, Karimganj praying for a decree inter-alia for declaration of their jote right over the suit land and for a further declaration that the judgment and decree obtained by the opposite party No. 1 in Title Suit No. 68 of 1967 and Title Suit No. 34 of 1968 from the Court of Munsiff, Karimganj against the opposite party No. 2 to 6 and the proceedings of the Title Execution case No. 3 of 1998 are illegal, null and void and in -operative in law. They also prayed for a permanent injunction restraining the opposite party No. 1 from dispossessing them from the suit land by executing the decree obtained in the above mentioned suits. Along with the plaint they also filed an application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC for temporary injunction restraining the opposite party No. 1 from executing the decree in the aforesaid suits.
2. Their case in short, in the plaint is, that the manager of the opposite petty No. 1 gave jote settlement of the suit land to one Muslim AH and his wife Joyful Bibi by executing a registered deed No. 2364 dated 23.2.1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.