SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Gau) 238

J.N.SARMA, I.A.ANSARI
Budhua Mura – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prabin Mahanta

I. A. ANSARI, J

Indian criminal jurisprudence rests on cardinal principle that an accused shall be presumed to be innocent until the time he is proved guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. This basic tenet must be borne in mind by every Court exercising criminal jurisdiction.

2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order, dated 3.11.96, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Tinsukia, in Session Case No. 32(T)/89, convicting the accused-appellant under Section 302/34IPC and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.50007- and in default, to suffer R.I. for a further period of 2 (two) years.

3. The case of the prosecution, as unfolded at the trial, may, in brief, be stated as follows:-

On 7.3.87, one Sri Ajoy Chakraborty of Ledo lodged a written ejahar (Ext. 1), at Ledo Police Outpost, alleging, inter alia, that on that very day i.e., on 7.3.87 at 8.30 p.m., his elder brother, . Ashok Chakraborty, was found lying in a critical condition near his house with an iron arrow struck into his chest and, on being asked, the said injured disclosed that it was Budhuwa Mura, a resident of Natun Line of Ledo Tea Estate, who had shot him with arrow. Treating th



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top