J.N.SARMA, I.A.ANSARI
Budhua Mura – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Indian criminal jurisprudence rests on cardinal principle that an accused shall be presumed to be innocent until the time he is proved guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. This basic tenet must be borne in mind by every Court exercising criminal jurisdiction.
2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order, dated 3.11.96, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Tinsukia, in Session Case No. 32(T)/89, convicting the accused-appellant under Section 302/34IPC and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.50007- and in default, to suffer R.I. for a further period of 2 (two) years.
3. The case of the prosecution, as unfolded at the trial, may, in brief, be stated as follows:-
On 7.3.87, one Sri Ajoy Chakraborty of Ledo lodged a written ejahar (Ext. 1), at Ledo Police Outpost, alleging, inter alia, that on that very day i.e., on 7.3.87 at 8.30 p.m., his elder brother, . Ashok Chakraborty, was found lying in a critical condition near his house with an iron arrow struck into his chest and, on being asked, the said injured disclosed that it was Budhuwa Mura, a resident of Natun Line of Ledo Tea Estate, who had shot him with arrow. Treating th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.