P.G.AGARWAL
Hiren Ch. Ray – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Heard Sri B.D. Konwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Goswami, learned counsel for the Union of India.
2. Petitioner is the father of the deceased Dilip Roy @ Dilip Kumar Rai, who was picked up by the Army personnel belonging to 168 Field Regiment. The detenue was picked up on 10.11.2000 and the petitioner alleges that his father was tortured and thereafter, he died as a result of bullet injury. The petitioner, therefore, prayed for compensation.
3. The respondent-Union of India has filed an affidavit-in-Opposition, wherein, it is stated that the deceased was picked up and the said Dilip Roy, deceased led the Army to recover of. 3 rifle and while the Army party was returning with the deceased, there was ambushment by the Extremist out outfit and in the cross-fire, deceased-Dilip Roy sustained bullet injury and died. In this connection, Gossaigaon P.S. Case No. 175/ 2000 was registered and the final report was submitted in this case. Thus, uncontroverted facts that the deceased was picked up by the Army and he died while in army custody. From the perusal of the post-mortem report, we find no basis regarding allegation of torture etc. However, the fact rema
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.