SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Gau) 273

P.G.AGARWAL
Hiren Ch. Ray – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.D.Konwar, P.P.Bairagi, J.M.Konwar

P.G. AGARWAL, J.—

Heard Sri B.D. Konwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Goswami, learned counsel for the Union of India.

2. Petitioner is the father of the deceased Dilip Roy @ Dilip Kumar Rai, who was picked up by the Army personnel belonging to 168 Field Regiment. The detenue was picked up on 10.11.2000 and the petitioner alleges that his father was tortured and thereafter, he died as a result of bullet injury. The petitioner, therefore, prayed for compensation.

3. The respondent-Union of India has filed an affidavit-in-Opposition, wherein, it is stated that the deceased was picked up and the said Dilip Roy, deceased led the Army to recover of. 3 rifle and while the Army party was returning with the deceased, there was ambushment by the Extremist out outfit and in the cross-fire, deceased-Dilip Roy sustained bullet injury and died. In this connection, Gossaigaon P.S. Case No. 175/ 2000 was registered and the final report was submitted in this case. Thus, uncontroverted facts that the deceased was picked up by the Army and he died while in army custody. From the perusal of the post-mortem report, we find no basis regarding allegation of torture etc. However, the fact rema

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top