SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Gau) 333

B.LAMARE
Lily Tep and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Yangerwati, I.Jamir, E.Y.Renthungo, C.T.Jamir, A.Zhimomi

B. LAMARE, J-

I have heard Mr E.Y. Renthungo, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr I. Jamir, learned Addl. Advocate General for respondents Nos. 1 to 4, Mr.. C.T. Jamir, learned counsel for the respondent No. 6 and Mr. A. Zhimomi, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 5, 7, 8 and 9.

2. All the writ petitions are taken up together as it relates to the same question of facts and law as all the petitioners have assailed the absorption of respondent No. 6 and regularisation of respondent Nos. 5,7,8 and 9 and the officiating promotion of respondent Nos. 10 and 11, and also the validity of sub-rule(c) of Rule 6 of the Nagaland Soil & Water Conservation Service Rules, 1997.

3. Smt. Lily Tep, writ petitioner in W.P.(C) 118(K)2000 was appointed as Instructor, Class-Ill non-gazetted by order dated 6.1.1987 in the Department of Soil and Water Conservation, Nagaland. Her service was converted into Class-II gazetted by notification dated 29.9.1997 w.e.f. 1.6.1990.

4. Shri N.I. Toshi Ozukum, writ petitioner in W.P.(C) 127(K)2000 was appointed as Ranger, Class-Ill non-gazetted in the Soil and Water Conservation Department by order dated 6.1.1987. His post was converted into Class-II gazetted by
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top