SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Gau) 354

P.P.NAOLEKAR, B.B.DEB
Thaneswar Kalita – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.K.Roy Choudhary

P.P. Naolekar, C.J.—

Heard Mr. P.K. Roychoudhury, learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Govt. Advocate, Assam. None appears for the respondent Assam Seed Corporation Limited.

2. The appellant petitioner was appointed as a Junior Accountant in the year 1987 in the Assam Seed Corporation Ltd. On 1.9.93 the Managing Director of the Corporation issued a charge sheet under Rule 9 of the Assam Services(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1964(for short "the Rules, 1964") for alleged misappropriation of money and negligence of duties etc. while working as a Junior Accountant in Rangia Sales Point during the period from 15.10.91 to 15.2.92. The amount stated to be misappropriated was approximately Rs. 78,2447- and odd. The appellant petitioner was served with the charge sheet with the list of documents and also the list of witnesses. On 4.9.93 the appellant petitioner filed an application seeking inspection of the documents which have been shown in the list of documents supplied alongwith the charge sheet. The Enquiry Officer was appointed 16.10.93. On 4.11.94 the appellant petitioner again applied for inspection of the documents as he was not given inspection of the documents before t




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top