SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Gau) 143

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
B.K.Sharma, J.
Jibeswar Thakuria -Appellant
Versus
State of Assam -Resopndent
W.P.(C) Nos. 8921, 9417 of 2003 and W.P (C) No. 803 of 20041
Decided On : 27-02-2004

Advocates Appeared:
G.Choudhary, B.J.Ghosh, A.M.Borbhuyan, J.K.Laskar, J.Patowary, S.K.Singh, H.N.Sharma, S.Shyam, R.P.Sharma, P.Sharma, N.H.Mazarbhuiya, M.Mahanta, K.N.Choudhary, T.Kalita

The main legal point established in the judgment is the abuse of power in the transfer of government officials, the violation of transfer policies, and the malafide exercise of power by the authorities.

Headnote:

Transfer of Government Officials - Abuse of Power - Violation of Transfer Policies - Malafide Exercise of Power

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the legality and validity of their transfer orders, alleging that the transfers were not in public interest but were made due to extraneous considerations and political pressure. The court disposed of all three writ petitions by a common judgment.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the transfer orders were issued based on extraneous considerations and not in public interest. It concluded that the transfer orders were made on political grounds and to accommodate specific individuals, violating the established policies on transfer of government officials.

Issues: The main issues revolved around the legality and validity of the transfer orders, the abuse of power by the authorities, and the violation of transfer policies.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while transfer of government officials is an incident of service, it must be exercised honestly, bonafide, and reasonably in public interest. The court emphasized that the power of transfer should be exercised reasonably and fairly, and not for collateral purposes or extraneous considerations.

Final Decision: The court set aside the impugned transfer orders in all three cases and allowed the writ petitions, imposing a cost of Rs. 5000 in each case.

B. K. SHARMA, J.—

All the aforesaid three writ petitions have been filed by the respective writ petitioners assailing the legality and validity of the orders of transfer/transferring them from one place of another. It is their case that such orders of transfer are not founded on bonafide exercise of power, but have been issued illegally and arbitrarily and not in any public interest. According to them the orders have been issued due to extraneous consideration and out of sheer favouritism. Considering the allegations made in all three writ petitions towards assailing the orders of transfer, I have decided to dispose of all the three writ petitions by this common Judgment.

BRIEF FACTS LEADING TO FILING OF THE THREE WRIT PETITIONS W.R(C) No. 8921/03

2. The petitioner has been serving as Assistant Professor of Medicine in Guwahati Medical College and Hospital to which post he was promoted on 05.06.02. He has been transferred to Silchar Medical College, Silchar by the impugned order dated 21.10.03. When his representation dated 23.10.03 against the said order of transfer has not yielded any result, he has approached his court by filing this writ petition. According to the petitioner there ^are many senior persons who have been enjoying their posting in Guwahati Medical College and Hospital for many years. He asserts that the said order of transfer has been issued not in any public interest but on political pressure to satisfy and to accommodate the respondent No. 4 who was earlier posted in Silchar Medical College, Silchar by a notification dated 14.02.03. The respondent No. 4 did not carry out the said order of transfer and he was attached to the Guwahati Medical College and Hospital. It is the case of the petitioner that the transfer order has been issued just to accommodate the respondent No. 4 in Guwahati Medical College and Hospital and the same has been issued on extraneous consideration upon political pressure. According to the petitioner the respondent No. 4 has been continuing in Guwahati for several years. As per the averments made in the writ petition, the respondent No. 4 could get his order of transfer to Silchar cancelled and in his place one Dr. Dhiraj Das w as sought to be transferred by an order dated 14.10.03. However, said Dr. Dhiraj Das could also get the order of transfer cancelled using the political pressure and a notification dated 15.10.03 canceling the earlier order of his transfer dated 14.10.03 was issued. By the said notification dated 14.10.03, the respondent No. 4 who was shown as Assistant Professor of Medicine, Silchar Medical College, has been transferred in the same capacity and posted in Guwahati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati. According to the petitioner there has been violation of the adopted policies of the Govt. in the matter of transfer of Govt. Servants. He has also referred to a decision of this Court' passed in W.R (C) No J 5216/01 (Shri Dayal Das Vs. State of Assam and others) by which this Court emphasized the need to check the arbitrary transfer of Govt. Officials. In pursuance to the said judgment of this court the Govt. of Assam in the Department of Personnel issued an office Memorandum on 04.02.02 followed by yet another office memorandum dated 22.05.02 laying down the policies on transfer. For a ready reference the aforesaid Office memorandum dated 22.05.02 is quoted below :

”No. ABP. 116/10/7 Dated Dispur, the 22nd May,2002

Office Memorandum

Subject : Transfer and posting of Government Officials

Government Office Memorandum Nos. ABP 40/91/117 dated 19.04.1992 and ABP. 116/01/04 dated 04.02.2002 clearly lay down the policy for transfer and posting of Government Officials. Frequent transfer and posting not only leads to avoidable expenditure on TA/DA etc. but also demoralizes Government Officials. In order to streamline the system, the following further instructions are issued.

(1) Provisions contained in Government office Memorandum No. ABP. 116/01/4 dated 04.02.2002 are to be s

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top