SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Gau) 25

RANJAN GOGOI
Maya Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.B.Majumdar, N.Dhar, G.Singh, B.Sinha , B.Choudhary

RANJAN GOGOI, J.—

Heard Mr. N. Dhar, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam and Mrs. G. Singh, learned Central Government Standing Counsel.

2. An area of land measuring 3 1/2 justies covered by permanently settled estate (Taluk) No. 14884/195 Khoas Baux and permanently settled estate (Taluk) No. 14885/196 Nasir Hanif alongwith other lands were requisitioned some time in the year 1964 for use by the B.S.F. authorities. The total area of land so requisitioned appears to be approximately 22 bighas belonging to the different land owners of which the petitioners are the owners of land to the extent of 3 1/2 justies as described above. Though possession of the land was handed over to the B.S.F. authority sometime in the year 1965 and such possession has continued unabated till date, the petitioner who has not been paid any compensation or rent in respect of her land, has instituted the present proceedings praying for appropriate orders from this court for payment of compensation for requisition and use of the land by the respondent authorities and in the alternative for release of the land from the possession of the respondent authorities.

3. Th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top