SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Gau) 406

H.N.SARMA
Monoranjan Dutta – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Dhar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.Bhattacharyya, K.K.Nandi, D.C.Mahanta

H. N. SARMA, J.—

The challenge made in this revision petition is an order passed in Execution Case No. 20/2001 dated 18.3.2002 by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 1, Jorhat, by which an application filed by the petitioner/judgment-debtor objecting the execution of the decree has been rejected. In challenging the said order, the petitioner has also incidentally questioned the original judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division No. 1, Jorhat dated 7.9.2000 passed in T.S. No. 13/95 by which the suit of the plaintiff/respondent was decreed ex-parte.

2. I have heard Mr. D. C. Mahanta, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. P. Bhattacharya, learned counsel for the petitioner/judgment debtor and also heard Mr. K.K. Nandi, learned counsel for the decree holder/opposite party. Also perused the materials available on record.

3. For the purpose of disposal of the revision petition, a brief of the relevant may be stated as follows :

The plaintiff filing of this revision petition inter alia are that the plaintiff filed the T.S. No. 13/95 in the court of the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division No. 1, Jorhat praying for removal of air pollution and noxious at




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top