SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Gau) 55

P.P.NAOLEKAR, RANJAN GOGOI
State of Assam and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Kumar Das – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.Phukan, S.Sharma, S.Paul, S.Munir, J.Roy, J.Choudhary, K.N.Choudhary

P.P. NAOLEKAR, CJ-

Heard Mr J. Roy, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr K.N. Choudhury, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent/writ petitioner.

2. The respondent/writ petitioner filed a writ petition registered as WP(C) No. 8323/2002 wherein he was challenged the order of his transfer from PCC Sub-Division (PWD) to Guwahati Building Sub-Division issued on 18.12.02. The effect of the transfer order has been stayed by an interim order passed by the learned Single Judge on 20.12.02. The interim order passed by the learned Single Judge staying the transfer order of the respondent/ writ petitioner, was challenged by the Govt by filing an application for vacating the same and by order dated 28.1.03 the order of stay was confirmed. That is how the Govt. is before us on appeal.

3 At the time of hearing of the appeal against the order dated 28-1-2003 we have made it clear to the counsel appearing for? the respective parties that we shall dispose of the writ petition itself after heating the arguments. It is clear from the record that the respondent/writ petitioner who was working as Assistant Executive Engineer, PWD; at Haflong was transferred on 16.12.02 to PCC Su


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top