JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Heard Mr. S. Rupachandra Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. By this review petition, the petitioner is asking for reviewing the judgment and order of this court dated 18.4.2006 passed in W.P(C) No.171 of 2005. From careful perusal of the present review petition as well as from the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner is asking for reviewing the judgment and order of this court dated 18.4.2006 passed in W.P(C) No.171 of 2005 on the ground that the case of the petitioner that the ROP 1999 had been adopted in the Manipur Plantation Crops Corpn. Ltd. has not been effectively decided by this court. The very counsel who appeared for the petitioner in the connected writ petition, W.P(C) No.171 of 2005 is also appearing for the present review petitioner in the present review petition.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for the review petitioner at length and Mr. S. Nepolean Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, this court was not in a position to come to the conclusion that the ROP 1999 was adopted in the Manipur Plantation Corps Corporation Ltd. while considering

Click Here to Read the rest of this document