SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Gau) 237

RANJAN GOGOI
Baikuntha Rajbongshi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and Ors. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.C.Chakraborty, H.Bezbarua, P.Rai, R.Mazumdar

1. Heard Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.C. Chakraborty, learned Central Govt. Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondents.

2. As agreed to by the learned counsel for both sides and having regard to the subject-matter involved this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage.

3. Pursuant to an advertisement issued in January 2007 inviting applications for filling up vacant posts of General Duty Constables in the CRPF the petitioner submitted his application and participated in the selection process. The petitioner cleared the selections. However, in the mandatory medical examination which was carried out on 30.5.2007 the petitioner was found to be unfit on account of the following medical findings :

"(1) B/L Inf. Turbinate Hypertrophy. (2) B/L Flat Foot."

4. Under the norms for medical examination contained in the advertisement issued a candidate declared unfit on medical ground is required to be informed of the reasons for the rejection of his case. A candidate, if not satisfied with the findings of the medical officer/board, is vested with the right to file an appeal for re-medical examination with proof of his fitness in the form of a medi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top