SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Gau) 349

H.N.SARMA
Ganesh Ch. Konwar – Appellant
Versus
United Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.R.Borthakur, S.Dutta, B.D.Goswami

1. The petitioner was appointed as Arm Guard in the UBI, Narayanpur Branch vide order dated 21.7.1988 issued by the Regional Manager of UBI and accordingly he joined on 5.8.1988 as Arm Guard. In due course of time, the petitioner was promoted to the rank of Cashier in the year 1991 by the competent authority of the Bank.

2. While the petitioner was serving in the aforesaid capacity as Cashier under the respondent Bank in the same branch and was posted in the Hatilung Branch in North Lakhimpur, the Bank floated a voluntary retirement scheme for Officers and other staffs, with a view to streamline the functioning of the Bank by increasing market competition and customer's expectation for initiating Bank's optimum productivity and profitability. The said scheme was titled as 'United Bank of India's Employees Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2000'.

3. The relevant eligibility criteria for seeking benefit under the said scheme by an employee as provided under clause 4, 5 and 6 are quoted below :

"4 Eligibility. - (i) All permanent full time employees of the Bank will be eligible for seeking voluntary retirement under the Scheme provided they met the following eligibility criteria on the date o









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top