SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Gau) 555

T.NANDA KUMAR SINGH
Rajani Goswami – Appellant
Versus
Anil Chandra Haloi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.Bora, P.Kakati, S.Kathaniar

T. Nandakumar Singh, J. -

By this criminal petition under Section 482 read with Section 483 and Section 401 of the Code of Crminal Procedure, 1973 (for short CrPC), the petitioner is challenging the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Tinsukia dated 27.11.2008 passed in Criminal Revision No. 25 (2) of 2008, dismissing the revision petition filed by the petitioner and upholding the order of the learned Executive Magistrate, Margherita dated 16.05.2008 in Case No. 56 of 2007.

2. Mr. P. Bora, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party-respondent, at the outset, contended that the present criminal petition being the second revision petition, filed by the petitioner against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, i.e. impugned judgment dated 27.11.2008, upholding the order of the learned Executive Magistrate, Margherita dated 16.05.2008, is liable to be rejected at the threshold inasmuch as under Section 397 (3) of the CrPC the present petitioner, who had already filed a revision petition against the order of the learned ' Executive Magistrate dated 16.05.2008 before the learned Sessions Judge and the learned Sessions Judge also upheld the said order of the learned Executive Ma
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top