SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Gau) 775

P.K.MUSAHARY
Pradip Das and Ors. – Appellant
Versus
Bidal Sarkar and Anr. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.Bhattacharjee, A.Ghosh, N.Guha

1. I have heard Mrs. N. Guha, learned counsel for the petitioners and also heard Mr. P. Bhattacherjee, learned Addl. P.P. appearing on behalf of the State of Tripura/respondent No.2. None appears for the Complainant/respondent No.1.

2. This criminal revision petition has been filed under section 397 read with section 401 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1973 for setting aside the judgment and order dated 17.6.2003 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in Criminal Appeal No.50(3)72001 confirming the conviction ordered by the leajned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, West Tripura, Agartala in judgment dated 26.7.2001 rendered in Case No. CR 2019/1997 modifying the sentence to the effect that the convict petitioners shall suffer R.I. for 6 months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500 each in default of making payment of fine to suffer further R.I. for 10 days for commission of offence under section 325, IPC and also to make payment of fine of Rs. 100 in default of making payment of fine to suffer S.I. for 5 days for commission of offence under section 341, IPC and directing the convict petitioners to surrender before the learned trial court on 19.7.2003 to suffer the sentenc









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top