SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Gau) 579

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
T.Vaiphei, J.
Raid Laban College Society and Anr. -Appellant
Versus
State of Meghalaya and Anr. -Resopndent
WP(C) No.332(SH) of 2008
Decided On : 13-08-2010

Advocates Appeared:
N.D.Chullai, S.Jindal, D.Senapati, G.N.Sahewala

Headnote:

Societies Registration Act, 1860 - University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Section 2(f) - University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Section 12(B) - Right to Information Act, 2005 - Section 2(h), 5(1), 5(2) and 19(1) - Management of college - Administrative staffs - Byelaw of societies - Facts giving rise to this writ petition are that College was established and that petitioner No.1 is a Society registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860 bearing registration while petitioner No.2 is governing body of College represented by its Secretary - It is case of petitioners that College is a private college governed by constitution and Byelaw of societies and was established with funds procured from various private sources and at time of establishment of college no Government contribution in any form whatsoever was made available to College - Governing body of College is solely entrusted with management of college and appoints its teaching staffs and other administrative staffs for which it never obtained any approval from Government of Meghalaya - In other words according to petitioner College is not under administrative control of Education Department of State of Meghalaya - Held, This rule according to Maxwell means that when two or more words which are susceptible of analogous meaning are coupled together they are understood to be used in their cognate sense - They take as it were their color from each other, that is, the general is restricted to a sense analogous to a less general. The same rule is interpreted in Words and Phrases Associated words take their meaning from one another under doctrine philosophy of which is that meaning of a doubtful word may be ascertained by reference to meaning of words associated with it such doctrine is broader than maxim generic - In fact latter maxim is only an illustration or specific application of broader maxim - Argument is that certain essential features of attributes are invariably associated with words business and trade as understood in popular and conventional sense and it is color of these attributes which is taken by other words used in definition though their normal import may be much wider - Under circumstances court have no alternative but to hold that College is neither controlled nor substantially financed by State-respondents so as bring it within ambit of term public authority under section 3(h)(i) of Act - Resultantly impugned notification declaring College as public authority cannot be sustainable in law - Petition succeed

1. This writ petition is directed against the Notification bearing No.EDN. 113/2007/39, dated 17.5.2007 issued by the Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department (Respondent No.2) declaring that Raid Laban College, Laban, Shillong is one of the public authorities under the Right to Information Act, 2005 ('the RTI Act').

2. The facts giving rise to this writ petition are that Raid Laban College, Laban, Shillong ('the College') was established in the year 1984 and that the petitioner No.1 is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 bearing registration No. SR/RLCLS-187/84 of 1984 while the petitioner No.2 is the governing body of the College represented by its Secretary. It is the case of the petitioners that the College is a private college, governed by the constitution and Byelaw of the societies and was established with funds procured from various private sources and at the time of establishment of the college, no Government contribution in any form whatsoever was made available to the College. With the initiatives and contributions of the members of the College and with the endless efforts and hard work of the governing body of the College which is entrusted with the overall management of the same, the College within a short span of time became one of the elite educational institutions in the State of Meghalaya. The College is permanently affiliated to NEHU vide Notification dated 16.7.2003 issued by the Vice Chancellor, NEHU. The University Grants Commission, New Delhi vide their letter dated 7.10.2004 has also included the College in the list of colleges prepared under section 2(f) of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 under the head "Non-Government Colleges" teaching up to Bachelor Degree making it eligible to receive Central assistance in terms of the Rules framed under section 12(B) of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956. The University Grants Commission "UGC" has also recognized the College as Non-Government College. The governing body of the College is solely entrusted with the management of the college and appoints its teaching staffs and other administrative staffs, for which it never obtained any approval from the Government of Meghalaya. In other words, according to the petitioners, the Raid Laban College is not under the administrative control of the Education Department of the State of Meghalaya.

3. It is also the case of the petitioners that the Directorate of Public Instruction, Meghalaya vide order dated 31.3.1987 sanctioned an Ad hoc Grant-in-Aid for the pay and D.A. for certain numbers of full time staff : no other grant or aid was received by the College from the Government of Meghalaya. The College has been bearing all the other expenses of the institution starting from infrastructure costs, administrative expenses including staff salaries. It is admitted by the petitioners that the Government of Meghalaya also sanctioned some non-recurring ad hoc grants to the College from time-to-time, the last of which was received by it on 15.12.2006. According to the petitioners, the total strength of the staff of the College including teaching and non-teaching staff is 84 and the Government of Meghalaya by sanctioning the Ad hoc Grant-in-Aid till 2006 was meeting the expenditure relating to the pay and D.A. of only 33 staff members, which was also being stopped on 1.1.2007 and the remaining payment used to be made by the College from its own sources. It is claimed by the petitioners that the College has been duly maintaining its account till now. It is contended by the petitioners that mere granting of Grant-in-Aid by the Government of Meghalaya towards pay and D.A. for certain number of full time staff by no means take away the status of the College as a purely private institution nor does it empowers the Government of Meghalaya to exercise control over the administration and management of the College. It is also the contention of the petitione

















































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top