P.K.MUSAHARY
Keruupfeu – Appellant
Versus
State of Nagaland & Ors. – Respondent
Heard Mr. Kekriengulle, learned counsel for the petitioner. Heard also Ms. Y. longkumar learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate and Mr. C. T. Jamir, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Wati Jamir, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 3 to 7.
2. The petitioner was appointed as Sr. Lecturer on contract basis for a period of 1 (one) year vide an order dated 30.03.1993 which was extended from time to time till her contract service was regularised by an order dated 15.06.2005 pursuant to Memoranda dated 18.02.2004 and 12.05.2004. But regularization was made effective from 16.01.2004. By an order dated 16.11.2006, the Government decided to grant past contract service benefits to those employees regularised in accordance with the aforesaid Memoranda dated 18.02.2004 and 12.05.2004 in the ratio of 3:1. The said benefit as denied to the petitioner.
The petitioner alleged that contract services of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 as Lecturers was regularized by an order dated 28.03.2001. The respondent Nos. 3, 6and 7, who were on deputation, were absorbed by an order dated 28.03.2001, with retrospective effect from 15.01.2001. By an order dated 20.09.2002,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.