GAUHATI HIGH COURT
P.K.Musahary, J.
Bhim Ram & Ors. -Appellant
Versus
State of Assam -Resopndent
Criminal Appeal No. 230 of 2007
Decided On : 19-01-2012
Indian Penal Code – 1806 - Sec-tion34 - NDPS Act - Section 55 - FIR - Punishable - Subsequent part of investigation was made by one S.I. police G.R.P.S. who also examined informant and and completion of investigation submitted charge sheet against all convict appellants - On receipt case records and on consideration materials trial court found prima-facie case punishable against all three accused persons and accordingly charge read was framed against all three accused persons - Charge was read over and explained accused persons which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried –Held, NDPS which provide more stringent provision for conviction - This Principle law is that more stringent is provision of conviction more rigorous investigation and trial necessary - Looking at manner in which investigation was conducted and procedure followed by sending samples of seized articles for chemical examination there no doubt no such rigorous investigation has been made rather it found full loopholes - Basic requirement is that sample packets received FSL authority are same contraband articles recovered and seized from convict appellants - Ordered accordingly
The appellants were convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.PS. Act,1985 in Sessions (Special) Case No. 1/07 vide judgment and order dated 3.8.2007 passed by the learned Special (Sessions) Judge, Barpeta. By the said judgment and order the convict/appellant No. 1 ShriBhimRamwas sentenced to undergo R.I. for 15 years and fine of Rs. 3 lakhs and in default of payment of fine, further R.I. for 5 years and the convict/appellant No.2 Shri Sanjoy Ram and convict/appellant No. 3 Smt. IndraDevi were sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years each and fine of Rs. 1 lakh in default of fine, further R.I. for 2 years. This appeal is directed against the said conviction and sentence.
2. The prosecution story is that on 18.12.06 at about 12.43 P.M.(noon), 5636 Down Usha Express arrived at Barpeta Road Railway station at No.l Platform. The incharge of Barpeta Road Railway GRP outpost made the GD entry No. 343 dated 18.12.06 and proceeded alongwith his staff to check the suspected luggages in the said train. He asked his staff Shri Dilip Sarma, Hemanta Sarma and Lachit Hazarika to check from engine side. He along with staff Shri Bipin sarma and Shri Anil Gayari started to check from the middle of the train. While checking the luggages at about 1.10 P.M. in sleeper Coach No.5.12 (6857) under the Berth No. 65 they found a black trunk, two V.I.P Suit cases and a bag. He interrogated the passengers who were found on berth No. 65. All the persons admitted that the said luggages belonged to them and when he wanted to check a person Bhim Ram by name delivered the keys and when he opened the trunks etc. he found them full of suspected ganja. In the mean time the train started to leave and so they brought down all the three passengers with luggages to the Platform. In presence of witnesses he took the weighment and found net 85 Kg.500 Grams of suspected ganja.He seized the articles in presence of witnesses. Samples were drawn and packed. The accused persons were forwarded under Section 42 of N.D.P.S. Act and the sample packets were sent to FSL for examination and report. As per FSL report the samples of seized articles tested positive that is cannabis (ganja). The outpost incharge lodged FIR on 12.1.07 with the OC, Rangia GRP PS and accordingly a case being Rangia GRPS. Case No. 4/07 was registered under Section 20(b) NDPS Act. The in-charge of the Barpeta Road GRP out post who lodged the FIR was entrusted with the investigation of the case .He examined the seizure witnesses and other witnesses.The subsequent part of the investigation was made by one Trailokya Talukdar S.I. of police of Rangia G.R.P.S. who also examined the informant and one T.T.(E) and on completion of investigation submitted the charge sheet against all the convict appellants under Section 20(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act. On receipt of the case records and on consideration of the materials the learned trial court found prima-facie case punishabale under Section 20(ii)(b) N.D.P.S. Act read with Sec-tion34 I.P.C. against all the three accused persons and accordingly a charge under Section 20(ii)(b) of N.D.P.S. Act read with Section 34 IPCwas framed against all the three accused persons. The charge was read over and explained to the accused persons to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
3. In order to establish the case, the prosecution examined as many as 8 witnesses while the defence examined none although opportunity was provided as per the provision under the law. The learned trial Court on consideration of the materials and on appreciation of evidence on record and upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, convicted and sentenced the appellants as mentioned earlier.
4. I have heard Mr. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the convicts/appellants and Mr. B.S.Sinha, learned Addl. P.P, Assam
5. I have also gone through the records of the case particularly the FIR, seizure lists,charge sheet and the evidence of the prosecution witnesses.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.