SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Gau) 348

N.CHAUDHURY
Bhabastosh Malakar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S.S.S. Rahman, Ms. S.F. Rohman.
For the Respondent: Mr. U.K. Goswami.

Heard Mr. S.S.S. Rahman, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. U.K. Goswami, learned Standing Counsel, N.F. Railway.

2. By this appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, claimant has challenged the judgment and order dated 18.05.2012 passed by the learned Member (Technical) Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati in OA II U-73/2010 dismissing the claim petition.

3. The present appellant as claimant instituted a claim in the Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 stating that his 18 years old son, Bapan Malakar boarded on Kamakhya Express on 03.02.2010 at Lumding Station and proceeded towards Guwahati but while the train approached near Barahu Railway Station he fell from the train and died on the spot. An unnatural death case was registered by GRPS of Jagiroad Police Station and investigation was held. The Officer Incharge of the GRPS Police Station, Jagiroad and Officer In-Charge of GRPS Guwahati, issued certificate stating that the son of the appellant had fallen down from the train and died on the track. However, the claimant could not produce any valid ticket or pass and no witness was examined to






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top