HRISHIKESH ROY
RAJU CONSTRUCTIONS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ASSAM – Respondent
Heard Mr. BD Das, the learned Sr. counsel representing the petitioners in the WP(C) Nos.4107/2011, 726/2008 & 5767/2010 respectively. Advocates Mr. PJ Saikia and Mr. M. Choudhury are appearing for the other petitioners in this group. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOC) is represented by the Sr. Counsel Mr. SN Sarma in the WP(C) No.3523/2012. In the other cases, the IOC is represented by Mr. N. Deka, the learned Counsel. The Employees Provident Funds Organization (EPF) and their authorities are represented by their Standing Counsel, Mr. PK Roy. As agreed to by the parties the cases are heard analogously and this judgment will cover all the cases.
2. These cases pertain to minor contract works under the IOC and the primary grievance of the petitioners is the tender requirement of furnishing the Provident Fund Code (hereinafter referred to as “the PF Code”) in order to be eligible for submitting tenders under the IOC. The petitioners contend that they are small time contractors employing less than 20 employees in their respective establishments and therefore the Employees Provident Funds and the Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as “the EPF Act”) do
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.