SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Gau) 627

UJJAL BHUYAN
Rajib Choudhury – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
for the petitioner: Mr. K D Chetri
for the respondents: Mr. N Barua, CGC

JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL)

Heard Mr. KD Chetri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N Baruah, learned Central Govt. Counsel for the respondents.

[2] By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 06-12-2006 and for re-instatement in service.

[3] Petitioner was a Constable in the Border Security Force (B.S.F). At the relevant point of time he was serving in the ‘G’ Coy under 94 Battalion B.S.F., Roshan Bagh, Murshidabad (West Bengal).

[4] On 03-12-2006, a charge-sheet was issued by the Commandant, 94 Battalion B.S.F. under section 46 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (BSF Act) charging the petitioner of committing a civil offence of agreeing to accept or attempting to accept a gratification, other than legal remuneration as a motive or reward for doing or forbearing to do an official act punishable under section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The charge against the petitioner was that on 23-08-2006 while he was discharging his duty at Border Outpost, Meghna from 1200 hrs to 1800 hrs, he had improperly allowed safe passage to 4 cattle heads from India to Bangladesh through gate No.121 for the pur



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top