N.CHAUDHURY
NEMI CHAND GANGWAL – Appellant
Versus
SURESH KUMAR JAIN – Respondent
Whether an order passed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 by appellate court sitting on appeal against final decree of a suit is appealable under Section 104 read with Order XLIII Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, is the question to be answered in revision petition?
2. Petitioner Nemi Chand Gangwal, as plaintiff, instituted Title Suit No. 243/2010 in the Court of learned Munsiff No. 1, Kamrup at Guwahati which was subsequently transferred to the Court of learned Munsiff No. 2. By this suit, plaintiff prayed for a decree for declaration along with permanent injunction for restraining the defendants and their employees, agents etc. from demolishing the latrine and well of the plaintiff and from locking their passage for access to latrine and well. The defendants contested the suit by filing written statement and otherwise. After conclusion of trial, the learned Munsif by his judgment and decree dated 21.03.2014 dismissed the suit with cost. Aggrieved, plaintiff preferred Title Appeal No. 36/2014 in the Court of learned Civil Judge No. 2, Kamrup at Guwahati. Appeal has been admitted and records have been called for.
3. In this appeal plaintiff filed an application un
New Kenilworth Hotel (P) Ltd. Vs. Orissa State Finance Corporation & Ors: (1997) 3 SCC 462
Shah Babulal Khimji Vs. Jayaben D. Kania : (1981) 4 SCC 8
Madhusudan Begetable Products Co. Ltd. Vs. Rupa Chemicals : AIR 1986 Guj 156
Firm Chhunilal Laxman Prasad Vs. Agarwal and Co. : AIR 1987 MP 172
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.