SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Gau) 50

N.CHAUDHURY
EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
SUPER WHITE INDUSTRIES – Respondent


Advocate Appeared
For the Petitioners:Mr. KK Nandi, Ms. J Paul, Advocates

ORDER (ORAL)

The judgment and order dated 20.11.2003 passed by the learned E.S.I. Court in E.S.I. Case No. 7/2000 has been called in question in this appeal under Section 82 of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the ESI Act’).

2. One Ashis Agarwal claiming to be proprietor of M/S Super White Industries, Katahbari, Guwahati-25, filed an application under Section 75 of the ESI Act before the E.S.I. Court stating that two notices were served on him on 05.01.1998 and 07.04.1998 asking for a sum of Rs. 6,435/- as contribution for the period from April, 1997 to September, 1997 and also demanding recovery of the same, were not maintainable and illegal inasmuch as, the ESI Act itself is not applicable to his firm. He stated that he maintained muster rolls, wage register, cash book etc. and on 05.03.1998, an inspector of the E.S.I. Corporation visited his concern. He wrongly described the concern to be a partnership one with one Sajjan Agarwal who has no relation in connection whatsoever, with the business at all. The aforesaid notices dated 05.01.1998 and 07.04.1998 were wrongly issued considering that the firm of the petitioner is a factory within the me


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top