SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Gau) 105

UJJAL BHUYAN
TARUN HAZARIKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Heard Mr. DP Chaliha, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. UP Chaliha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. SS Sarma, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A Sarma, learned counsel for the respondents.

By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents for payment of pension.

Facts of the case may be briefly narrated.

Petitioner had joined service in the State Bank of India (SBI) as Clerk-cum-Cashier on 21.10.1980. In the course of his service, he was promoted to the rank of Deputy Manager, and at the relevant point of time, he was serving as Deputy Manager in the North Lakhimpur Branch of SBI.

SBI issued a circular on 30.12.2000, deciding to implement a Voluntary Retirement Scheme for the employees called, SBI Voluntary Retirement Scheme (Scheme). All permanent employees of SBI who had put in 15 years of service or had completed 40 years of age as on 31.12.2000 were eligible to avail the Scheme. Intending eligible employees had to apply between 15.01.2001 to 31.01.2001. As per the Scheme, gratuity, provident fund, pension, leave encashment etc., as due, were to be paid to the employees who wo




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top