SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Gau) 572

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
Abhay Manohar Sapre and Ujjal Bhuyan, JJ.
Motilal Sinha – Appellant
Vs.
State of Assam – Respondent
W.A. No. 179 of 2014
Decided On: 19.05.2014

Advocate Appeared
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:S. Kanungoe and J. Chetry, Advocates
For Respondents/Defendant:U. Rajbongshi and B. Bhuyan, Advocates

Headnote:

Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991 - Railways Act, 1989 - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 – Accident - Grievous injuries - Railing/safety provision - Claiming Compensation - Case of appellant is that his son met with an accident on while he was returning home from school - At that time, the son was aged about 16 years and was a student of Class-X - Son had boarded motor boat belonging to Inland Water Transport Department, Govt. of Assam at Rajnagar Ferry Ghat - Motor boat was operated by an unauthorized person and did not have any railing/safety provision - It was packed with passengers, auto-rickshaws, bicycles, scooters etc - While moving away from jetty, motor boat took a sharp turn due to rash and negligent driving by boat operator. As a result, the passengers experienced a sudden jerk and became imbalanced - Appellants son also became imbalanced and fell into turbulent water of Barak river - Within a few moment of his felling down, he was sucked by rotating propeller of motor boat because of which he sustained grievous injuries on his both hands as well as on back side of his ribs - As injuries were of serious nature and required advanced treatment, appellants son had to be bought to Hospital - Held, It is not disputed that motor boat belonged to Inland Water Transport Department, Govt. of Assam and that appellants son was a passenger of that boat - Accident which occurred and which resulted in severe injuries to appellants son leading to amputation of his right hand at shoulder joint is also not disputed - Appellants son fell down from boat into the water of the Barak river and was sucked by rotating propeller of motor boat which resulted in his injuries - Nature of services provided by inland Water Transport Department i.e., plying of motor boats on rivers, is such that there is inherent danger to the passengers travelling on such boats - Therefore, highest degree of care and caution is required to be taken by Department for safety of passengers - Thus, applying above principle of no fault liability, Inland Water Transport Department is liable to compensate the appellants son for injuries suffered by him while travelling as a passenger of a motor boat belonging to Department - Thus, having regard to discussions made above, respondent No. 2 i.e., Director, Inland Water Transport, Government of Assam, Ulubari is directed to pay compensation to son of appellant - Petition allowed.

JUDGMENT

Ujjal Bhuyan, J.

1. This writ appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.01.2014, passed in WP (C) No. 5949/2006, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed by the learned Single Judge. Case of the appellant is that his son Sri Bidyut Singha met with an accident on 07.06.2006 at about 4 p.m. while he was returning home from school. At that time, the son was aged about 16 years and was a student of Class-X. The son had boarded the motor boat belonging to the Inland Water Transport Department, Govt. of Assam at Rajnagar Ferry Ghat. The motor boat was operated by an unauthorized person and did not have any railing/safety provision. It was packed with passengers, auto-rickshaws, bicycles, scooters etc. While moving away from the jetty, the motor boat took a sharp turn due to rash and negligent driving by the boat operator. As a result, the passengers experienced a sudden jerk and became imbalanced. Appellant's son also became imbalanced and fell into the turbulent water of the Barak river. Within a few moment of his felling down, he was sucked by the rotating propeller of the motor boat because of which he sustained grievous injuries on his both hands as well as on the back side of his ribs. Though the passengers raised a hue and cry and told the boat operator to switch off the engine, he did not do so. Ultimately, son of the appellant was rescued by the passengers, whereafter he was taken to the Silchar Medical College Hospital. As the injuries were of serious nature and required advanced treatment, appellant's son had to be bought to the Gauhati Medical College Hospital. Appellant's son was treated at Guwahati Medical College Hospital requiring hospitalization where his right hand had to be amputated at the shoulder joint. He also suffered fracture of his left hand as well as back ribs.

2. First Information was lodged by the brother of the appellant before the Arunachal Police Out Post under Silchar Police Station on 07.06.2006 about the aforesaid incident, bearing general diary entry (GDE) No. 93. The in-charge of Arunachal Out Post issued a certificate dated 02.07.2006 regarding the accident and the injuries suffered by the appellant's son.

3. Appellant had to incur heavy expenditure in the treatment of his son. He also could not attend to his professional duties as because he was pre-occupied looking after his son. In such circumstances, he submitted a representation before the Director, Inland Water Transport Department, Assam on 23.06.2006 seeking financial assistance and compensation. As there was no response, appellant filed the related writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to pay compensation because of the injuries sustained by his son on account of the above accident.

4. The writ petition was resisted by the respondents, who filed a common affidavit. The allegations made by the appellant regarding driving of the motor boat by an unauthorized person in a rash and negligent manner were denied. Referring to the police report dated 20.07.2006 submitted by the In-charge of Arunachal Police out Post, it was contended that it was totally an accident and there was no negligence on the part of the respondents. While the respondents admitted that the ferry/motor boat belonged to the Inland Water Transport Department, Govt. of Assam, they denied any negligence on the part of the authority and denied any liability on their part.

5. Learned Single Judge after hearing the matter, held that no independent inquiry was conducted by the respondents though a departmental inquiry was conducted which was not conclusive. While the learned Single Judge recorded that it was not disputed that the ferry/motor boat was owned by the Inland Water Transport Department, Govt. of Assam and that there was no dispute as regards the injuries sustained by the son of the appellant which led to amputation of his right hand, in the absence of any independent inquiry, learned Single Judge declined to awar












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top