HRISHIKESH ROY
Madhusudhan Paul – Appellant
Versus
Ganesh Biswas – Respondent
” Heard Mr. D. Mazumdar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners (defendants). Also heard Ms. P. Bhattacharya, the learned Counsel for the respondent (plaintiff).
2. The respondent applied for recovery of possession of the suit land under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as ' the S.R. Act' ), where he pleaded that he was in possession of the suit land from where he was forcibly dispossessed by the defendants on 18.2.2009. According to the plaintiff, the defendants earlier made an unsuccessful attempt to dispossess the plaintiff on 31.12.2008 but since the authorities failed to take any action on the plaintiff ” s complaint, the emboldened defendants dispossessed the plaintiff on 18.2.2009. The defendants contested the suit along with a counter claim where they pleaded that the plaintiff transferred the suit land to one Prafulla Das on 7.12.2001 and the said Prafulla Das in turn sold the possessory right on 23.4.2003 to the defendant No.1 Madhusudhan Paul. According to the defendants the plaintiff had filed a false case and therefore they made a counter claim for declaration of possession in their favour.
3.1 The learned Munsi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.