A.K.GOSWAMI
Jalal Uddin – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent
Arup Kumar Goswami, J.
1. In WP(C) 25/2015, I have heard Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. A. Matin, learned counsel for the respondent No. 8 and Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 7.
2. In WP(C) No. 348/2015, I have heard Mr. D.A. Kaiyum, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned State counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 to 5, Mr. A. Sarma, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 6, Mr. A Matin, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 7 and Mr. M.K. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 8.
3. In WP(C) No. 532/2015, I have heard Mr. R. Singha, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. B.J. Talukdar, learned State Counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 7, Mr. A Sarma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 8 and Mr. A Matin, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 9.
4. All these three writ petitions are filed in connection with settlement of Balisatra Bi-weekly market and therefore, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, these three writ petitions had been taken up for disposal together and are now being disposed of by this com
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.