M.R.PATHAK
Tajuk Charu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
M.R. Pathak, J.
1. Heard Mr. Jakir Hussain, learned counsel for the Petitioner. Also heard Mr. Kardak Ete, learned Sr. counsel & Addl. Advocate General, assisted by Ms. Geeta Deka, learned Addl. Sr. Govt. Advocate, appearing for the State Respondents No. 2 & 3; Mr. Sanjay Kr. Medhi, learned counsel, with Mr. Arnav Das and Mr. Abhai Kr. Singh, learned counsels, for private Respondent No. 4 and Mr. Ninnong Ratan, learned counsel for Respondents No. 5, 6 and 7. However, there is no representation on behalf of the Respondents No. 1 and 8, Union of India, though name of CGC has been reflected in the cause list. Mr. Ete, learned Addl. Advocate General, Arunachal Pradesh, has submitted that as per the communication received from the Union Public Service Commission [UPSC, in short], the Selection Committee meeting, connected with the instant writ proceeding, is scheduled on 12.09.2014 and he also brought to the notice of this Court, the order dated 28.08.2014. Mr. Ete, submitted that there is an urgency in the matter and as the parties have already exchanged their affidavits in the matter, he, thus, prayed before the Court, to take-up the matter finally. In this regard, learned coun
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.