1. The judgment and decree dated 15.6.2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge No. 3, Kamrup, Guwahati in Money Suit No. 92 of 2006 has been called in question by the plaintiff of the suit in the present appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure. By the impugned judgment and decree, the learned trial court has dismissed the suit of the plaintiff in entirety.

2. The present appellant, as Plaintiff instituted Money Suit No. 92 of 2006 in the court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) No.3 at Guwahati on 30.5.2006 stating that it is partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act, 1932 and engaged in business of supplying tools and machinery to Government and Non-Government Organization. The defendant No. 2 issued a notice on 16.8.2005 from registered firm/ suppliers/ contractors for supplying Hearing Kits, Wheel Chairs, T.V and Tape Recorder etc. to be supplied under implementation of ADIP Scheme sponsored by Govt. of India. Defendant No. 2 being a registered firm submitted sealed quotation for the purpose. On 19.8.2005 defendant No.2 placed order for supply of 600 Hearing Kits @ Rs.10,248/-, 450 nos. of wheel chair @ Rs.10,798/-, 260 TV Sets @ Rs. 19,99