A.K.GOSWAMI
Dambaru Dhar Medhi – Appellant
Versus
Chakradhar Medhi – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. K.R. Surana, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. N. Haque, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. This appeal is presented against the judgment and decree dated 28.09.2005, passed by the learned District Judge, Barpeta, in Title Appeal No. 6 of 2002, confirming the judgment and decree dated 03.06.2002 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Barpeta, in Title Suit No. 9 of 1995, whereby the suit was partly decreed.
3. The case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff, Dambarudhar Medhi and defendant No. 1, Chakradhar Medhi are sons of Bhuban Chandra Medhi. Defendant No. 2 is the wife of defendant No. 1 and defendant Nos. 3 to 7 are sons of defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Bhuban Chandra Medhi died on 05.08.1991, when he was about 100 years old leaving behind the property as described in Schedule-A to the plaint. Plaintiff is the younger son of Bhuban Chandra Medhi. The plaintiff, in connection with his service, was not residing in his family house but he kept constant touch with his father and other members of the family and took care of Bhuban Chandra Medhi during his lifetime. Bhuban Chandra Medhi was a literate person and he could
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.