SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Gau) 781

A.K.GOSWAMI
Dambaru Dhar Medhi – Appellant
Versus
Chakradhar Medhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. K.R. Surana, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. N. Haque, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. This appeal is presented against the judgment and decree dated 28.09.2005, passed by the learned District Judge, Barpeta, in Title Appeal No. 6 of 2002, confirming the judgment and decree dated 03.06.2002 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Barpeta, in Title Suit No. 9 of 1995, whereby the suit was partly decreed.

3. The case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff, Dambarudhar Medhi and defendant No. 1, Chakradhar Medhi are sons of Bhuban Chandra Medhi. Defendant No. 2 is the wife of defendant No. 1 and defendant Nos. 3 to 7 are sons of defendant Nos. 1 and 2. Bhuban Chandra Medhi died on 05.08.1991, when he was about 100 years old leaving behind the property as described in Schedule-A to the plaint. Plaintiff is the younger son of Bhuban Chandra Medhi. The plaintiff, in connection with his service, was not residing in his family house but he kept constant touch with his father and other members of the family and took care of Bhuban Chandra Medhi during his lifetime. Bhuban Chandra Medhi was a literate person and he could
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top