SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Gau) 872

A.K.GOSWAMI
Md. Asgar Ali – Appellant
Versus
Md. Goumar Ali – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the appellants: Mr. N. Dhar, Mr. B. Hussain
For the respondents: Mr. A. Choudhury

JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. N. Dhar, learned counsel for the appellants/defendants assisted by Mr. B. Hussain and Mr. A. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/plaintiffs.

2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 01.10.2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Barpeta, in Title Appeal No.7/2000 allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment and decree dated 21.02.2000 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Barpeta, in Title Suit No.34/1990, whereby the suit of the plaintiffs was dismissed.

3. Initially, by a judgment and order dated 14.08.1992, suit of the plaintiffs was dismissed on the ground of pecuniary jurisdiction. However, in Title Appeal No.4/1993, by an order passed on 12.05.1994, the judgment of the learned Trial Court was set aside and the case was sent back for re-trial. Challenge made to the said order dated 18.05.1994 was negated by an order passed by this Court on 18.05.1994 in Civil Revision Petition No.322/1994.

4. The second appeal was admitted to be heard by an order dated 16.03.2004 on the following substantial questions of law:-

“(1) Whether the Chitta (Ext-1) is admissible in evidence in support of the claim


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top