SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Gau) 935

N.CHAUDHURY
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Sunrise Traders – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:Ms. B. Devi, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. A. Goyal, Advocate.

ORDER :

1. This is an appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 preferred by N.F. Railways challenging the judgment and award dated 30.07.2007 passed by the learned Railway Claims Tribunal at Guwahati in O.A. No. 459/2000. By that judgment, the learned Tribunal directed the railway authorities to make payment of compensation to the claimant respondent to the tune of Rs. 71,400/- along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum if the payment is not made within a period of 60 days from the date of order.

2. Respondent M/s Sunrise Traders filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal at Guwahati stating that it is owner of 951 packets of onion booked in safe, sound and secured condition meeting all legal formalities as per railway rules at Manmad Railway Station in Maharastra. The consignment was booked by Maharastra State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited for delivery at New Guwahati. The booking was made on 20/22.03.2000 and same was delivered on 04.04.2000 whereupon it was found that the wagon doors were kept open, wagon roof was leaky and also water marked condition on the roofs and side walls. The consignment was found wet damaged and in r



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top