SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Gau) 893

N.CHAUDHURY
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sahadat Khan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. SK Goswami, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd through its Regional Manager has preferred this appeal challenging the judgment and award dated 28.2.2006 passed by the learned WC Commissioner at Guwahati in WC Case No. 53 of 2004 thereby directing the insurance company to make payment of Rs. 1,02,186/- as compensation to the claimant under section 4(i) © (ii) of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 (now renamed as ‘Employees Compensation Act, 1923’ and hereinafter referred to as ‘ the Act’).

2. The basic fact involved in this appeal is that one Sahadat Khan filed a claim petition before the WC Commissioner stating that he was employed by one Mazid Ali of Barpeta as handyman of a Tata Mobile vehicle No. AS-15/7806. On 5.1.2004, when the vehicle was moving, it met with an accident at NH-30 at Chakchaka under Sorbhog PS. The vehicle turned turtle on the left side of the road and consequently the handyman sustained fracture injury on his head and on his right humerus in addition to a contusion on right joint and bruise on other parts of the body. He was initially treated at SHC Sorbhog and thereafter to Barpeta Civil Hospital . According to him, because of the injuries, he could not pursue h











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top