SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Gau) 721

NISHITENDU CHAUDHURY
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Mondal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant : A. Sharma and S. Katakey.

JUDGMENT :

Nishitendu Chaudhury, J.

1. In this appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (now renamed as Employees' Compensation Act, 1923), the insurance company has challenged the judgment and award dated 30.03.2006 passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation, Dhubri in W.C. Case No. 2/2004. By this judgment and award, the W.C. Commissioner has directed the insurance company to make payment of Rs. 1,77,904/- to the claimant and the owner of the vehicle has been directed to make payment of Rs. 50,703/- towards interest on compensation. While the insurance company has preferred MFA No. 65/2006 challenging the judgment and award dated 30.03.2006 in entirety, the owner, namely, Narayan Chandra Saha has preferred MFA No. 51/2006 against the decision of the W.C. Commissioner directing the owner to make payment of interest component of the impugned judgment and award. Since, both the appeals are directed against two parts of the same judgment and award, both the appeals are taken up together for disposal. One Narayan Mondal filed a claim petition before the W.C. Commissioner at Dhubri leading to registration of W.C. Case No. 2/2004. The claimant stated that he



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top