RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN
Bamar Yinyo – Appellant
Versus
State of Arunachal Pradesh – Respondent
Rumi Kumari Phukan, J.
1. Heard Domo Boje, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.H. Nabam, learned Additional Advocate General, Arunachal Pradesh, assisted by Ms. Pubi Pangu, learned Government Advocate, for State Respondents No. 1 to 4. The petitioner, by filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for invoking the extra-jurisdiction of this Court, for implementation of the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission (CPC), in toto.
2. The brief facts, of the instant case, are that, in compliance to the directives of the Central Government for implementation of the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, the respondent authorities have issued the Office Memorandum dated 05.01.2008, under Order No. FIN/E-II/22/2008, by the Commissioner (Finance), Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Boje, has contended that Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, is accepted by the State respondents and made applicable to the employees under the Government of Arunachal Pradesh as per their entitlement/admissibility from 01.01.2006 by notional fixation of pay in the rev
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.