SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Gau) 48

N.CHAUDHURY
Monowar Hussain – Appellant
Versus
Manoranjan Das – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mrs. R. Choudhury, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties :Mr. A.R. Sikdar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Heard Ms. R. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.R. Sikdar, learned counsel for the opposite party. Order dated 01.07.2015 passed by learned Munsiff, North Salmara, Abhayapuri in Title Suit No. 18/2009 has been called in question in the present revision petition. By that order the learned court refused to grant leave to the defendant for producing registered sale deed No. 212 dated 03.02.1997.

2. The sole opposite party, as plaintiff, instituted Title Suit No. 18/2009 in the court of learned Munsiff, North Salmara, praying for declaration of his right, title and interest and recovery of khas possession of the suit land further declaring that Udayasan Das, father of the plaintiff, was the exclusive owner in possession over the suit land. The defendants No. 1 to 5 filed a joint written statement denying the case of the plaintiff. They stated in paragraph 9 of the written statement that during the life time of Late Udayasan Das and Late Balai Chandra Das they jointly sold from Schedule ‘A’ land a plot measuring 3 K 11 L to Sri Phonindra Nath Das vide registered sale deed No. 212 dated 03.02.1997 from patta No. 155.

3. In course of trial, plaintiff exhibited






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top