SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Gau) 143

T.VAIPHEI, MANOJIT BHUYAN
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Bamin Tari – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. S.C. Keyal
For the Respondents: Mr. S. Dutta

JUDGMENT :

Manojit Bhuyan, J.

1. At the relevant time the Respondent i.e. Bamin Tari was serving as the Additional Commissioner in the Department of Customs & Central Excise, being so promoted w.e.f. 30.7.2009. Memo of charges was issued against him on 5.3.2014/7.3.2014 under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 (in short the “1965 Rules”) as follows:

“Article-I

Shri Bamin Tari, while posted as Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Inland Container Depot (ACTL.) Ballabhgarh (Haryana) during the period from April 2002 to February 2003 at ACTL, Ballabhgarh and while holding supervisory charge of processing of shipping bills and examination of export consignments in the Export Shed, failed to detect the over valuation of export goods with respect to export by M/s Sunrise International, M/s Tech Industrial Corporation, M/s Brightwel Enterprises, M/s International Engineers and M/s Vikrant Overseas and allowed them to avail undue Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) benefits to the tune of about Rs.8.61 Crores at the cost of Government exchequer. He allowed final processing of shipping bills and the consignments to be “let exported”. Shri Bamin Tari,





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top