N.CHAUDHURY
Vinit Tibrewala – Appellant
Versus
Bidya Kanta Upadhyaya – Respondent
1. Heard Mr. P. Mahanta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Sundi, learned counsel for the opposite parties.
2. In this application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the order passed by the learned Civil Judge, Sonitpur in Misc. Appeal No. 1 of 2010 under Order XXXIX Rule 2-A of the Code of Civil Procedure has been called in question.
3. The present petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 46 of 2006 in the court of learned Munsiff No.1 at Tezpur praying for his declaration of right, title and confirmation of possession along with other prayers. In the said suit he also filed an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for injunction and the learned trial court passed an order on 25.9.2006 directing the parties to maintain status-quo with respect to the suit property. It is the case of the opposite parties here that prior to institution of the suit there was a proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. before Executive Magistrate at Tezpur wherein an order of attachment has been passed. The said order of attachment was subsequently vacated. The opposite parties thereafter preferred a revision petition be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.